The Designers legal duty to eliminate or reduce risk 'so far as is reasonably practicable' (SFARP) has caused some concern to designers since CDM was first introduced. With input from a range of construction institutions, the paper outlines the difficulties Designers face in relation to its implementation and how these issues are still relevant today.
This report has been created to generate industry discussion amongst construction industry organisations and the HSE. Designers have a requirement to exercise a legal duty 'so far as is reasonably practicable' (SFARP) and this is at the centre of the construction design process. If uncertain as to the sufficiency of their actions, there is a real concern that Designers may be become unduly risk averse.
This paper provides a background to SFARP and explains the issues. It is hoped that a consensus may be reached as to a compliant route through the design process and ambiguity may be reduced.
So Far Is Reasonably Practicable
Content type: Briefing sheet
Last updated: 28/04/2022
You may also be interested in
- Type
- Infrastructure blog
How the APPGI will drive change in UK government policy in 2025
Engineering can deliver change and strengthen communities, writes Mike Reader MP, new chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Infrastructure.
- Type
- Infrastructure blog
How Chile involves all levels of government when planning infrastructure
A recent Enabling Better Infrastructure (EBI) Live session explored how Chile balances national and local needs.
- Type
- ICE Community blog
'You don’t need to be a superhero to get a Fellowship!'
Sam Uren, an ICE Fellow since 2018, believes that perfectionism shouldn’t put people off from applying for qualifications.